The Meaning Of Freedom Of Expression

The Meaning Of Freedom Of Expression Countries over the world have various constitutions and laws that administer the nations, clearly some may comparable contingent upon the nation, and some are additionally unique. Notwithstanding, the Freedom of Speech and Expression is basic in a large portion of them, particularly in nations that are not under autocracy administering. The right to speak freely has to do with liberating individuals to communicate their musings anyway they need with no sort of impedance. This is a significant issue over the world, with no exemption of Malawi. Besides, the issue of articulation has to do with the media in light of the fact that these are the guard dogs of the general public and they connect the individuals with the legislature. The press needs to do the investigating for the country, it must be straightforward and responsible in its news detailing, thus the media and press do get together with bunches of issues. The right to speak freely is characterized as the opportunity to talk without control and impediment or both. It proceeds to give political rights that empower one to share thoughts. Fundamentally, the Freedom of Expression involves things that empower one to give, get and look for data without taking a gander at the methodology utilized. It is said to help in vote based system to work and furthermore open investment in dynamic since residents can't unreservedly communicate their commitments on the off chance that they don't have the opportunity engaged to them. An article in the widespread announcement read that, the free correspondence of thoughts and feeling ought to be considered as keeps an eye on most noteworthy right.(David 2012) In as much as the individuals are given outright rights to talk and distribute whatever they like, it is additionally said that the law is probably going to stand firm at whatever point any of the rights is mishandled. This implies the opportunity of articulation is something that is significant and must be thought of on an enormous note. Indeed, even the article 5 of the general announcement underwrites this and includes to state limits are a bit much most definitely. (David 2012) Foundation of the Freedom of Expression The ability to speak freely goes, thinking back to the fifth and sixth BC in the Roman Republic whereby the principle rights were opportunity of religion and the right to speak freely of discourse, likewise, it was talked of by Rashidun and Al-Hashimi, Islams, in their letter to one of the strict adversaries. As years passed, different individuals battled for it from multiple points of view until the primary state declaring the right to speak freely of discourse was given on December 4, 1770 in Denmark-Norway. Individuals like John Stuart Mill brought up that without opportunity there can barely be accomplishment in things like governmental issues and different things related, which as indicated by him required free articulation. Notwithstanding, the Freedom Forum Organization said that it is imperative to perceive the restrictions of the right to speak freely as it might strife with different things. (David 2012) The Malawi government has additionally embraced the idea of the right to speak freely of discourse since the time it got its autonomy from Britain and had the majority rule government. Majority rules system manages the voice of the individuals; evidently that is the reason it goes connected at the hip with the right to speak freely and articulation. The Malawi Constitution ensures the opportunity of articulation and perspectives it as an essential right. It takes a stab at the general population to make the most of their entitlement to be educated through unlimited access to data. Points and Objectives To see if there has been a headway of the opportunity of articulation or whether it has/is weakening. Since its foundation, things have been occurring that it has not been anything but difficult to tell whether this opportunity is truly working out there or possibly it is a distant memory. To inspect the progression of the rights in the legislature and reflect how the residents are being taken care of concerning the opportunity of articulation. How precisely is the administration actualizing its arrangements on the individuals, is it being over legitimate or maybe it is forcing issues on the individuals without thinking about their privileges, or maybe it is doing fine and dandy. To assess the degree of the opportunity the press has here in Malawi How far does the Malawian government take its opportunity of articulation, how much does it approve it. To discover the media has they genuinely are carrying out their responsibilities uninhibitedly without impediments Are the media houses genuinely allowed to report whatever they are committed to answer to the country of Malawi? Or then again maybe they have mishaps? To evaluate how the right to speak freely is being utilized by the media and push on the individuals. To see through how the opportunity of articulation and discourse have been streaming throughout the years. To comprehend what precisely it intends to have that sort of opportunity, and furthermore gain proficiency with its constraints. Issue Statement The media is a guard dog for the general public, and its main responsibility is to keep the country educated, engaged and taught, it needs to do anything in its capacity to be there for the general public and post for it. Be that as it may, in Malawi, the opportunity of articulation, or press opportunity is said to have been received numerous years prior, clearly as right on time as when freedom from the British government was allowed. Presently, the issue is that there is by all accounts a prevention on this opportunity of articulation and the manner in which the media is carrying out its responsibility. Its it is possible that it isn't being conceded to them in full or there are heaps of misguided judgments about it. The media is enduring and there is no exactness in its activity, this lone implies that the country isn't getting precise data, and is hence not being dealt with reasonably. Speculation After leading an examination on the assessment of the ability to speak freely and articulation, the potential results are envisioned. The administration once in a while will in general assume responsibility for the media specialists, in this manner constraining their ability to speak freely and articulation. At the point when the individuals, media and press appropriately practice their opportunity of articulation, they will in general come out with positive outcomes since that is work very much accomplished for them to serve the country in a legitimate way without restrictions. A few media experts abuse their privileges and cross their limits all for the sake of having opportunity of articulation, therefore different people groups rights are damaged. Writing REVIEW So much has been said or research on the subject of opportunity of articulation and the media, associations, and even people have a considerable amount to state about it, others give some accentuation on it as in its significance in the media and others even give a diagram of how it is streaming in the nation and furthermore how or what the media thinks about it. The right to speak freely of discourse has to do with individuals having the option to give their perspectives on things of their advantage, and the opportunity of the press gives the rights to the print media with the end goal for them to unreservedly communicate what they really accept. In any case, having the ability to speak freely doesn't mean reserving the privilege to damage or uneasiness others. The opportunity that is included here has to do with how much innovativeness one can bring for the point of improving the social orders that we live in. this opportunity is there to enable individuals to examine their legislature and accomplish what is best for them two, as it were it has to do with censuring the initiative both decidedly and adversely and wind up having what is best for the country. To live without opportunity is official yet with opportunity comes duty in revealing. (Orwell 2009) Opportunity of articulation is significant if the individuals are to partake in dynamic issues, particularly for nations that are supposed to be equitable like Malawi itself. Individuals can not have the option to take an interest openly in what is happening around them on the off chance that they don't have the opportunity, for example things like picking of pioneers to direct them. Along these lines, this issue isn't just fundamental for individual addition yet in addition it helps in keep up the vote based soul that the nation has. This opportunity plainly gives the general public to voice out their considerations on issues openly with no unsettling influences. Moreover, this is something that requirements full help in light of its situation in popular government and open investment in policy driven issues and furthermore the media. On an editorial perspective, the opportunity to give out information can go under various assaults. Weight on the writers represents an exceptionally enormous danger. An article discharged by MISA said that Freedom of articulation is a fundamental right, which is explicitly ensured in the Malawi Constitution. Hence, this program tries to battle for the general population to make the most of their entitlement to be educated through unhindered access to data. This one kept on saying that MISA is battling for the Access to Information (ATI) bill. Area 37 of the Malawi Constitution accommodates access to data. The designers of the Constitution anyway made this option to get to data subject to a demonstration of parliament however didn't set a time period for the order of the law on access to data. Then again, some data plainly expresses that a long time since the selection of the Constitution, there is still no empowering represent access to data. Evidently, as per Malawi Institute of Journalism, a pastor once said that the instance of the July 20 exhibits that were held in the nation, he saw that some jouranalists who were covering the shows were pum meled by the police and some radio broadcasts put off air by the Malawi correspondences Regulatory Authority MACRA (Malawi Institute of Journalism 2012) Still on the idea of the opportunity of articulation being abused, the legislature has been named as the greatest violator of the opportunity of articulation in Malawi followed by the overall population, and this is as per the Media gathering of Malawi (MCM). Mr Anderson Fumulani of the MCM said that a review uncovered government as a significant violator of press opportunity. (Ganthu 2002). Legislative center Radio overseeing chief Al Osman cautioned that with severe media laws been presented, opportunity of articulation is under danger. He kept on saying that the media simply give a plat

R v Hebert Case Analysis free essay sample

Neil Hebert was associated with having burglarized the Klondike Inn. After the police found Hebert, they set him in custody and educated him regarding his privileges, and took him to the R. C. M. P separation in Whitehorse. Hebert reached counsel and acquired lawful exhortation with respect on his right side to decline to give an announcement. In the wake of practicing his entitlement to contact counsel, Hebert was investigated by the police. During the cross examination, Hebert demonstrated that he didn't want to say something. In endeavor to get data out of Hebert, the police set him in a cell with a covert official. The official was wearing regular clothes and was acting like a suspect collared by the police. The covert office continued to draw in Hebert in a discussion, during which Hebert offered a few implicating expressions. This activity abused ss. 7 and 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The appointed authority barred the announcements made by Hebert to the covert official, and he was later absolved of the charges. We will compose a custom paper test on R v Hebert Case Analysis or on the other hand any comparative subject explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page Nonetheless, the Court of Appeal put aside the exoneration and requested another preliminary, inferring that the police had not damaged ss. 7 and additionally 10(b) of the Charter. The Court of Appeal permitted the intrigue, reasoning that the police had disregarded neither Hebert’s option to advise. For the court, the option to direct didn't exclude the police from scrutinizing the blamed in the nonattendance for counsel after insight had been reached. Moreover, the court stated that the option to stay quiet, as a central rule of equity, didn't forbid the blamed being addressed by covert cops. In that capacity, the court put aside Hebert’s quittance and requested another preliminary. Hebert bid the choice to the Supreme Court of Canada. Issues engaged with the Appeal The Supreme Court of Canada thought about two issues: First, regardless of whether the police had disregarded the blamed Charter for Rights while acquiring the announcements. Besides, if in reality they violated his privileges, regardless of whether they ought to be prohibited under s. 24(2) of the Charter. Under segment 7, the state isn't permitted to utilize its capacity to overrule the suspect’s will and invert his decision to address the power or stay quiet. Accordingly, the courts must embrace a way to deal with cross examination which stresses the privilege of the individual confined to settle on an important decision and which allows the dismissal of articulations, which have been gotten unjustifiably. There is nothing that disallows the police from scrutinizing a denounced after they have held direction. Police influence doesn't break the option to quietness. Likewise, the privilege just applies after confinement. Thirdly, the privilege doesn't influence willful articulations made to cell mates. Fourth, a qualification should be made between utilizing covert police to watch the blamed and utilizing covert police to evoke data in infringement to the charged option to stay quiet. Last, even where there is infringement of the presumes rights, the proof, where allowed, might be conceded. Just when the court is happy with the likelihood that its gathering would probably bring the organization of equity into unsavoriness can the proof be dismissed under s. 24(2) of the Charter. Choice McLachlin composing for lion's share. Greater part held that the proof was unacceptable and maintained the preliminary appointed authorities administering. Greater part found that the option to quiet was a rule of crucial equity and as such was ensured under segment 7. A denounced right can't be sabotaged through demonstrations of police cunning when being held in authority by police. In any case, if the denounced were to uncover data to a witness or covert specialist willingly then the announcements could be utilized against them. Greater part reasoned that: 1. Police damaged the privileges of the blamed while getting the announcements under segment 7 of the Charter 2. The proof ought to be barred under s. 24(2) of the Charter. Proportion Decidendi Constitutional issue was whether the police had disregarded Hebert’s option to stay quiet in procedure of acquiring data. Essential regulations from the principals of key equity were analyzed which included (1) researching custom-based law rules (2) looking at the Charter (3) inspecting the reason for the option to stay quiet. 1. Customary Law Rules McLachlin inferred that there was an individual whose privilege was in danger by the procedures that happened. Hebert reserved the privilege to pick whether to say something to the police or to stay quiet. 2. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms The essential perspective of the Charter was the predominance of the rights and the decency of the legal framework. Two related Charter rights praised this case: the option to direct under s. 10(b) and the privilege against self-implication under s. 11(c). What's more, as referenced prior, the privilege stay quiet was an issue. Lion's share found that these rights conceded Hebert option to be liberated from pressure by the police, yet additionally the option to pick whether to give an announcement. 3. Option to Remain Silent For this situation, the court held that the option to quietness was a standard of major equity (fundamental beliefs inside the equity framework that must triumph over these rights to benefit society). Proclamations can't be accomplished through police duplicity and quietness can't be utilized to make encourage any assumption of blame; hence, Hebert’s right was abused. Larger part presumed that option to stay quiet under s. 7 of the Charter ensured Hebert the option to conclude whether to give an announcement or not to the police. The option to conclude whether to give an announcement or not relied upon the blamed nearness for a working psyche. It restricts uncalled for direct for the benefit of the police. In conclusion, the option to stay quiet precluded the explanations that the police have acquired unreasonably and in infringement. Dominant part expresses that Heberts option to stay quiet had been damaged. Hebert had practiced his choice not to address the police. At the point when he later addressed the covert official, Hebert had not turned around this choice hence being deceived by the police abused his privileges. Be that as it may, Majority said this option to quiet was dependent upon restrictions: I. Nothing that expresses that the police are disallowed from addressing Hebert without his attorney in the wake of reaching his legal counselor ii. Influence from the police was passable up to the point of encroaching upon Heberts’ rights or precluding him from claiming a â€Å"operating mind† (duplicity utilizing covert). iii. Right applies simply after care and doesn't permit covert tasks preceding detainment. iv. The privilege doesn't influence explanations made intentionally by the charged to different cellmates. v. The correct covers just beguiling exercises by police where they endeavor to get articulations from the charged. It permits observing of the charged by the police or witnesses incase they catch any deliberate explanations made by the blamed. vi. Proclamations got infringing upon the option to stay quiet would be prohibited under s. 24(2) of the Charter where induction would bring the equity into unsavoriness. Furthermore, three elements where brought into conversation while deciding if the proof ought to be barred. 1. Impact of affirmation of proof on the decency: the confirmation of these announcements would finish up the preliminary to be uncalled for. Hebert was fooled into offering expressions to the police after unmistakably expressing he wouldn't like to offer any expressions. 2. How genuine the Charter infringement would be: for this situation, it would be very genuine on the grounds that the police intentionally were beguiling so as to pick up information. 3. Impact of the rejection: avoidance of the proof would bring about an exoneration. Significance of the case for unnatural birth cycles of equity For this situation the Supreme Court of Canada held that Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms gives people in authority the option to stay quiet. It gives an individual the option to choose whether they might want to offer expressions to specialists or not. On the off chance that the individual says something, they ought to be completely mindful that this announcement may present hazard. Offering expressions without information on future hazard, and furthermore after obviously expressing that you might not want to offer any expressions to police, is proof of procedural injustice. â€Å"The right of quietness, which has risen at both the pre-preliminary and preliminary stages, is supported by the benefit against self implication, and the more extensive ideas of the standard of law embraced by the liberal convention. The result of this privilege suggests that one can't be required to respond to an inquiry that may will in general open oneself to criminal conviction† (Hocking and Manville, 2001, p. 65). Guaranteeing that no unsuccessful labors of equity are endeavored, for example, unjust feelings, it is important to maintain the Charter of Rights and Freedoms for the aggregate understanding of equity among all. R v Hebert was in significance for unnatural birth cycles of equity since it guarantees that people are not fooled into offering incriminatory expressions and guarantees people are not pressured into admission where both may prompt illegitimate feelings. Sherrin (2008) expounds on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and its connection to unfair feelings. Sherrin (2008) states, â€Å"false admissions are a shockingly visit supporter of illegitimate feelings, so a sacred right not to address the specialists could help the blameless by permitting them to take cover behind an ensured cloak of quietness. † (p. 385). Frequently, the blameless will need to postpone their entitlement to stay quiet since they need to present an unmistakable defense to specialists about their blamelessness. Yet additionally, there are the individuals who practice this r

Jeffersons Party Essays - Conservatism In The United States

Jefferson's Party The view that many accept while contemplating our nation's political history is the Federalist Party was a committed supporter of a solid focal government. They accepted that the Constitution was an archive that should have been formed and revised so as to address the issues of the nation. The conventional perspective on the Democratic-Republican gathering is that they bolster state's privileges and feel that the majority of the overseeing of the nation ought to be done on the state level. The Democratic-Republicans, or Jeffersonian Republicans, likewise had faith in perusing the Constitution generally and award the administration controls that were tended to in the report. These perspectives are the essential principals that every one of gatherings depend on. It tends to be found in Jefferson's announcement to Gideon Granger that it, ?is doubtlessly best that the states are free and to everything inside themselves, and joined as to everything regarding outside countries.? In spite of customary portrayal of both the Federalist and Democratic Republican gatherings, government officials would split away from the traditional party stages and bolster gives that they felt emphatically about. For example, Daniel Webster, a Federalist from New Hampshire stood in opposition to an excessively forceful government with the issues in regards to drafting residents into the military. The ordinary Federalist would feel that a draft was important so as to safeguard the nation, and in spite of the fact that the Constitution didn't explicitly address the circumstance, revisions ought to be made for our national intrigue. Jefferson himself was a prime case of a hopeful government official who put the benefit of the nation over his Republican qualities. The Louisiana Purchase was acted in a way with which numerous ordinary Democratic Republicans would contend against. Jefferson bowed and formed the Constitution into a record that permitted him to twofold the size of the nation. He was eager to bargain with his unique qualities so as to improve and strengthen America. Jefferson told Samuel Kercheval, ?Some men look a constitutions with hypocritical reverence?..to sacrosanct to be contacted. In any case, I know likewise, that laws and foundations must go connected at the hip with the advancement of the human psyche.? The incredible proclamations made by Jefferson, Webster and numerous different lawmakers demonstrate that it is regularly important to bargain singular thoughts to benefit a whole nation. This premise of bargain is the genuine establishment of our administration and our history.

The ‘Choose Cadbury’ Marketing Strategy Essay -- Business and Manageme

The ‘Choose Cadbury’ Marketing Strategy The ‘glass and a half’, corporate purple, and the Cadbury content has become equivalent with Cadbury. Cadbury Schweppes have utilized these plan components to incredible impact in building up the ramifications of goodness that this symbolism proposes. In the late 1980s, another significant component, known as ‘taste’ was accentuated. Despite national inclinations about how chocolate should taste (for example dull chocolate is well known to Europeans, while Australians like creamier milk chocolate), the suggestion was certain that, Cadbury Schweppes gives taste and surface that, claims to all buyers. For instance, Cadbury Miniature Heroes incorporates an assortment of chocolates for example, dull milk chocolate (for example Cadbury Dairy Milk), creamier milk chocolate (for example Cadbury Dream), chocolate with hint of nuts (for example CDM Entire Nut), and so forth. In the mid 1990s, further stress was made on ‘taste’. For instance, the strapline ‘Chocolate is Cadbury’, which was based upon past brand esteems, empowers Cadbury to have a special interest what's more, taking responsibility for term ‘chocolate’ and the chocolate eating experience. In the mid 2000, Cadbury Schweppes presented another worldwide promoting procedure, known as the ‘Choose Cadbury’. The ‘Choose Cadbury’ technique was created from a consequence of broad research on purchaser conduct and mindfulness. The ‘Choose Cadbury’ procedure is a battle that plainly shows how a brand can create and how different messa...

The Golden Thread Essay Example

The Golden Thread Essay Example The Golden Thread Essay The Golden Thread Essay Exposition Topic: Story Of Two Cities A Tale of Two Cities is isolated into three unique books, Book one: Recalled to Life and Book two: The Golden Thread and Book three: The Track of a Storm, Which is something that I like about the book. The initial segment of the book is clarifying the time in which the novel happens, England and France in 1775. The age is set apart by contending and conflicting mentalities â€Å"It was the best of times, it was the most exceedingly awful of times. I like that the Dickens needs the peruser to comprehend what is happening in the timespan in which the story is told so we can comprehend the story better. Anoter motivation behind why I like A Tale of Two Cities is the means by which the story was told in third individual perspective. He exchanging his concentration among urban communities and among a few characters. The storyteller is likewise omniscient, not just uncovering the musings, feelings, and intentions of the characters, yet in addition providing authentic setting to the occasions that happen, remarking unquestionably upon them. The storyteller doesnt make the story so exhausting. The last motivation behind why I loved A Tale of Two Cities is its not your run of the mill gallant resistance of a wronged people who carry harmony to their general public, however a murderous transformation of a urgent, starved lower class. It wasnt simply some made up story either. It depended on a timeframe in which things where terrible in France and England and Charles Dickens gives you that through this novel. Despite the fact that I liked a few things in this book there where things about the book in which I didn't care for. For instance how nitty gritty the novel was. It was simply unreasonably tedious for me. I like a novel that clarifies whats going on however not to the degree that Dickens does. He gives you only a little to a lot to get a handle on all at once and at focuses in the book it is extremely difficult to comprehend the what he is attempting to tell. Another motivation behind why I disdain the novel is a portion of the characters, for instance I think Lucie Manette is a lamentable character. She includes a generalization into the novel, being that ladies are frail and can't deal with difficult circumstances. She is excessively great and nearly arrives at the purpose of irritation. One of different reasons why I loathe the novel is the old style writting. I am a peruser that must have the option to identify with the characters and the story line and in the event that I cant. I dont remain intrigued for long and it makes the story exhausting for me. It must have something I can comprehend what the characters are experiencing to make me need to understand more. Despite the fact that I liked a few things in this book the things I detested out number the things I did. I wouldnt recomend this story to anyone enless you needed to find out about France and England during the 1775 timeframe. The tale is simply excessively long and wouldnt keep intrest to numerous individuals. As I previously disclosed to you I just couldnt identify with the story and the characters. I think Dickens invests approach to much energy portraying immaterial subtleties and occasions. I additionally didnt like that there were two page long sentences it was simply to hard to get a handle on.

Security Failures In E-Trade Research Assignment Paper - 550 Words

Security Failures In E-Trade Research Assignment Paper (Essay Sample) Content: SECURITY FAILURES IN E-TRADENameUniversityIntroductionE-trade was founded in 1982 in California as a financial service firm and currently the company has its headquarters in New York City. E-trade was founded for active traders as well as the long-term investors. The company is an online discount stock brokerage organization that targets self directed investors. The companys platform provides the investors with the capability to buy as well as sell securities such as options, bonds, mutual funds as well as exchange traded funds through electronic trading systems or even though mobile phones. The company also provides banking services to those investors considered retailers with focus on sweep deposits and other saving products. Therefore, since the companies carries out its operation in reliance to online electronics platforms, there are cases on security failures that put its operation at stake hence leading to the question how safe its system is in relation to cyber crime.Security failuresAccording to Eugine Regi (2016), the online business transactions are associated with failures in customer privacy and security of information and this type of failure is caused by compromise that exists within the internet certificates that give criminals the advantage to counter the normal operation of the system hence leading to breakdown or slow execution of commands. Furthermore, when the certificates are compromised, the criminals have the capability of gaining access to the data based where they retrieve customer data which can be used for sabotage or theft of information.Besides, according to Eugine Regi (2016) online financial transactions are associated with delay in receiving of responses the executed transactions as well as some sort of hidden cost that the customers and in this case investors that they is not disclosed to them. For instance, in the case, of E-Trade, all the transactions are executed online and such type of business is fond of delay in receiving feedback from the automated system or the customer care representative. This happens when the system is brought down and thus all the transactions that had been carried out previously remain pending causing delays on the side of the customers as well as the company. Another consideration of failure that the company ends up imposing hidden charges to the customers to compensate the time lost when the system was down and also, when the system is hacked, there is hidden information that is siphoned from the customers which is used to create vulnerability to be used to attack other customers.According to Bingi, Mir Khamalah (2000), there are issues related to policing...

Word Form Rules in English

Many words can take on several different grammatical forms. For instance, the word grammar itself can be a noun (grammar), an adjective (grammatical), or an adverb (grammatically). There are also some words that have noun, adjective, adverb, and verb forms. Word forms can also change for reasons related to tense and singular/plural variation. ACT English is very conscious of these varying word forms and you’ll get a lot of questions that deal with the proper formation of words. Here are some rules to remember as you keep an eye on word forms in the English portion of the exam. Adjectives Modify Nouns Adverbs Modify Verbs ACT English often tests your ability to distinguish between adjectives and adverbs. For example, you might see a sentence that says â€Å"What I love the most about my favorite restaurant its fast, politely service.† Can you see the mistake? Service is a noun, but politely is an adverb, so you’ll want to look for an answer choice that changes politely to polite. A similar ACT English sentence might say something like â€Å"The staff at the restaurant serve me very polite.† In that case, you need to change the adjective polite to adverb politely, so it can correctly describe the verb serve. An Ending of â€Å"ly† Usually Means that the Word Form is an Adverbs†¦ But Not Always! This is a small rule that can trip you up if you scan a passage a little too quickly. Yes, many words with â€Å"ly† at the end are adverbs, including quickly from the previous sentence, but there are also some common â€Å"ly† words that are not adverbs. Scholarly is an adjective. Monopoly is a noun. Multiply is a verb. There are other exceptions too. If you take a careful look at any of these in the text, you can immediately know their grammatical function. Scan carefully so that you don’t make any mistakes as you answer the questions. The Verb and Noun Forms of a Word are Usually Different Some words don’t change when they become a verb or noun. You can take a test, or you can test someone’s knowledge. More often the word form does change when the grammar function switches between noun and verb. Compute (verb) becomes computation (noun), assess (verb) becomes assessment (noun), and so on. The Takeaway Words in written English often contain small but very important differences. If you miss these differences on the ACT, it will hurt your score. For a top score, teach yourself to notice these differences and recognize correct word forms quickly.